To make compassion the bottom line of life, to be open and vulnerable to others, to make community life the focus, and to let prayer be the breath of your life—that requires a willingness to tear down the countless walls that we have erected between ourselves and others in order to maintain our safe isolation. This is a lifelong and arduous spiritual battle because while tearing down walls with one hand, we build new ones with the other. After I had left the university and chosen a life in the community, I realized that, even in community, there are numerous ways to play the controlling games of individualism. Indeed, true conversion asks for a lot more than a change of place. It asks for a change of heart.
It really spoke to me the first time I read it, and reflects the heart of what New Testament scholar and theologian Marcus Borg calls Jesus' politics of compassion, whose works I recently discovered:
The dream of God as we see it in Jesus—his alternative social vision—is usefully crystallized in three complementary ways. First, I call it a "politics of compassion." For Jesus, compassion was more than a virtue for the individual. It was the basis of his criticism of the social system of his day. Compassion was also the paradigm or core value of his social vision: Jesus' understanding of God as compassionate led to a social vision grounded in compassion. It stood in sharp contrast to the core value of the social vision of elite theology, which was a politics of holiness and purity centered in the temple and legitimating the social order. Compassion as a core political paradigm suggests a political order that is life-giving, nourishing, and inclusive.
Second, the most effective shorthand nonbiblical language known to me for the dream of God and its opposition to elite theology and politics has been supplied by Walter Wink. Elite theology and politics lead to "domination systems." The opposite is 'God’s domination-free order." This—"God's domination-free order"—is the dream of God. . . .
Third, one may speak of Jesus’ social vision with one of his most frequently used phrases: "the kingdom of God. . . ." The kingdom of God is what the world would be like if God were king, rather than Herod or Caesar. In such a world, the poor would be fortunate, the mighty put down from their thrones, the rich sent away empty-handed. Domination systems would be replaced by God's domination-free order. (The God We Never Knew)
It was this kind of approach to spiritually from a Buddhist POV that initially got me interested in politics and pointed me towards a politics of compassion rather than a politics of purity, and what then got me to appreciate the radicalism embodied in the story of Jesus.
Our political order seems anything but life-giving, nourishing, and inclusive right now because the god of capitalism is the profit motive, Mammon in the abstracted-flesh, rather than compassion and love. I believe it was this realization behind these words from Oscar Romero dated 1/21/79:
No one can serve two lords.
There is only one God,
and that God will either be the true one,
who asks us to give things up when they become sin,
or it will be the god of money,
who makes us turn our back on the Christian God.
Perhaps it's a utopian dream, but I long for a world that mirrors that of the early Christian community depicted in Acts 4: 32-35:
The community of believers was of one heart and mind, and no one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they had everything in common. With great power the apostles bore witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great favor was accorded them all. There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale, and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need.