Sunday, November 30, 2014

11/30/14

Today I walked into church and was surprised to see that the green decorations I've become so accustomed to were replaced by purple ones, and Fr. Michael explained to me that it's because it's the beginning of Advent, the first day in the Church's liturgical year.

Still being new to all of this, it's interesting learning about the different liturgical seasons and colours, and how they're meant to shift the focus of one's spiritual practice as the year progresses.

In this case, advent means arrival, and traditionally, it refers to the coming of Jesus, the Messiah, God in the flesh. It's a time of waiting and prayer, the purple expressing a penitential and/or hopeful mood, with the focus being the mystical birth of Jesus and mindfulness of what we're doing in preparation for the 'second coming,' which was reflected in the day's scriptural readings, particularly Mk 13:33-37:

Jesus said to his disciples:
“Be watchful! Be alert!
You do not know when the time will come.
It is like a man traveling abroad.
He leaves home and places his servants in charge,
each with his own work,
and orders the gatekeeper to be on the watch.
Watch, therefore;
you do not know when the Lord of the house is coming,
whether in the evening, or at midnight,
or at cockcrow, or in the morning.
May he not come suddenly and find you sleeping.
What I say to you, I say to all: ‘Watch!’”


For me, too, I suppose, Advent represents the arrival of Jesus and everything he embodies (e.g., love, compassion, forgiveness, etc.); but it also represents more abstract ideas, like the fruits of spiritual awakening that we help cultivate through our spiritual practices.

The exhortation to be watchful and alert, for example, brought to mind similar passages in the suttas of the Pali Canon about the importance of mindfulness and heedfulness; and when the Gospel talks about staying alert and making sure you're doing your work when the master of the house comes, I see it exhorting the spiritual seeker not to neglect their contemplative duties. We must strive to be as alert and aware as possible, to remain attuned to the present moment because that is where God, enlightenment, is found.

Fr. Bill's homily reflected that idea, as well, I thought. He began by telling the same story about Sister Jose Hobday he told in his homily on Thanksgiving of her first experience of God's presence while being surrounded by nature and absorbed in the present moment:

One summer Saturday morning about forty years ago, I was waiting for my friend Juanita to come over. I was about twelve at the time. I became agitated and started complaining, and generally making a nuisance of myself. In fact, I was becoming rather obnoxious to everyone else in the house.

Finally, my father said to me, ‘Get a book, a blanket, and an apple, and get into the car.’ I wanted to know why, but he only repeated the order. So I obeyed. My father drove me about eight miles from home to a canyon area and said, ‘Now get out. We cannot stand you any longer at home! You aren’t fit to live with. Just stay out here by yourself today until you understand better how to act. I’ll come back for you this evening.’ I got out, angry, frustrated, and defiant. I thought immediately of walking home; eight miles was not distance at all to me. Then the thought of meeting my father when I got home took hold, and I quickly changed my mind. I cried and threw the book, apple and blanket over the canyon edge. I had been dumped and I was furious.

But it is hard to keep up a good, rebellious cry with no audience, so finally there was nothing to do but face up to the day alone. I sat on the rim of the canyon, kicking dirt and trying to get control of myself. After a couple of hours, as noon approached, I began to get hungry. I located the apple and climbed down to retrieve it—as well as the book and blanket. Upon reaching the top of the rim, I saw a pinon tree nearby which offered some shade. I spread the blanket in the shade, put the book under my head, and began to eat the apple.

I eventually became aware of a change of attitude. As I looked through the branches into the sky, a great sense of peace and beauty came to me. The clouds sat in still puffs, the blue was endless, and I began to take in their spaciousness. I thought about the way I had acted and why my father had treated me so harshly. Understanding began to come, and I became more objective about my behavior. I found myself getting in touch with my feelings, and with the world around me. Nature was my mother holding me for comfort and healing. I became aware of being part of it all, and I found myself thinking of God.

I wanted harmony. I wanted to hold the feeling of mystery. I wanted to be a better person. It was a prayerful time, a time of deep silence. I felt in communion with much that I could not know, but to which I was drawn. This sense lasted a long time, perhaps a few hours. I found I liked being alone and enjoyed the rich emptiness. It was as if I had met another person—me—and concluded I was not so bad after all.

By the time my father came to get me, I was restored. My father did not press me about the day. He asked no questions, and I gave him no answers. But I was different, and we both knew it. My father had dumped me into solitude and had challenged me to grow. Before I got out of the car, I thanked him. And from then on, especially during the summer, I would take a day to go off alone. I loved those times of solitude, of contemplation, and of prayer. I loved the world, and the God I had met that day. This habit of seeking solitude has stayed with me all these years.


In Sister Jose Hobday's experience of finding God in the quiet and solitude of nature, I saw similarities to the Buddha's encouragement to his monks and nuns to live and practice meditation in the wilderness, and the bliss of the Venerable Bhaddiya when recollecting the peace and happiness he discovered while practicing in the seclusion of the wilderness.

He also spoke about mindfulness and its role in helping redirect the 'monkey-mind' from negative and distracting thoughts to an awareness of the present and the presence of God in our lives, as well as how our experiences of suffering can help lead us towards that presence if we learn to wait and watch — to sit in the dark, awake, ready to see the light — referencing Mary Oliver's poem, "The Uses of Sorrow":

Someone I loved once gave me a box full of darkness.

It took me years to understand that this, too, was a gift.


This, of course, is something I'm quite familiar with since Buddhism specializes in utilizing the unsatisfactoriness and suffering (dukkha) in life as a motivation and means of gnosis.

Afterwards, Fr. Bill gave a talk on the spirituality of Isaac Hecker, the founder of the Paulist Fathers, which sadly few stayed around to hear. The focus was his mystical experiences and how he put them to work, with a number of quotes we took turns reading and a mindfulness exercise we were encouraged to try.

Surprisingly, there was a lot I could relate to, especially the progression of Fr. Hecker's spiritual journey. Like me, he had mystical experiences and a deep, spiritual yearning starting at a young age, and he spent a lot of his early years trying to find a spiritual tradition that could validate and/or nurture his inner experience of God, being inspired by the Transcendentalist movement before finally finding a home in the Catholic Church.

It definitely gave me a lot to think about; and my experiences at St. Philip these past few weeks have convinced me that I'm in the right place. I just wish more people appreciated the contemplative side of the Church as much as I do.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

11/27/14

Last night, I volunteered with some friends at the Oregon Food Bank packing 3 lb bags of frozen corn on the cob that'll get distributed to individuals and families in need around Oregon. All together, we helped bag and box 16,711 lbs of corn in about 2 hours.

Today, I spent the morning helping out at St. Philip's Thanksgiving dinner after mass (I especially enjoyed Fr. Bill's story about Sister Jose Hobday during the homily). Even though I was mainly just serving food, getting people something to drink, and clearing empty dishes, I got a chance to talk to a lot of nice people who didn't have anywhere else to go and/or no one to eat with.

Most seemed to really appreciate having a place to go and the generosity of everyone that made it all possible; and a lot appreciated the company, except the one guy who chastised us for over-serving the table. It was a great experience. It also made me thankful for the friends and family that I have and sometimes take for granted and forget to thank because I get so caught up in myself.

As much as I think about giving my time to help others, the more I reflect on the spirit of Mt 25:31-46, the more I'm inspired to actually do it. Plus, it kind of feels good doing something to help others. I think my heart grew half a size these past two days.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

11/23/14

Today is the last day of the year in the Church's liturgical calendar, so I thought it was fitting that the Gospel reading was the parable of sheep and goats in Matthew, by far one of my favourite passages in the Bible. Fr. Michael's homily summarized the parable by saying that we don't treat darkness with more darkness, or violence with more violence, but by being a community of shepherds and healers (bringing to mind Dhammapada verses 3-6). We should continually ask ourselves, How have I treated others today?

This is the single most important teaching for me. Everything flows out of it and leads to it. In this parable, Jesus teaches that, to enter the kingdom of heaven, one must help relieve the suffering of others (to possess a mind suffused with bodhicitta from a Buddhist point of view). The teaching itself arises out of a spirit of love, compassion, and generosity, and the spiritual practices we do are designed to help us develop these qualities within our heart. Have I found the lost? Have I bound the injured? Have I fed and clothed and comforted those in need? It's not rocket science. These are the important questions in life.

It's also one of the hardest teachings for me to put into practice. I'm lost myself, and more than not, I'm too busy worrying about feeding and clothing and comforting myself to pay much attention to the people around me. I ask myself how I've treated others today, and the answer disappoints me. If I were to be judged today, I'm afraid that I'd be counted among the goats rather than the sheep. Buddhism teaches that the more we cling, the harder it is to let go and truly give. Maybe that's why Jesus encouraged his followers to deny themselves and give up everything to follow him into the 'kingdom of heaven.'

Saturday, November 22, 2014

11/22/14

The Pacific Hermitage monks were in town tonight. Since Ajahn Karunadhammo went back to Abhayagiri, the newly-arrived Ajahn Jotipalo is taking his place as the most senior monk at the hermitage. A group of students from Jesuit High School sat in, as well.

Ajahn Jotipalo told a lot of stories about himself throughout the night that I found interesting. Before the meditation session, during tea time, he talked about working at the Insight Meditation Society and hearing stories about Dipa Ma and the psychic abilities she had. In response to another question, he talked about how synchronicities are statistically quite common and/or often the result of the way we interpret data (i.e., focusing on commonalities and not differences), but he also mentioned a few that occurred in his life.

After the meditation and Dhamma talk, the high school students were encouraged to ask questions, and he talked about growing up in a Methodist family, discovering Buddhism and having a near-death/out-of-body experience in Nepal, some of the tudong walks he's done in the US (one of which was with Fr. William Skudlarek, a Benedictine monk from St. John's Abbey in Collegeville, MN), and how his experiences have given him a strong conviction in the goodness of people.

It's somewhat surprising to me that one of the main insights he's gained from all of his experiences is about our capabilities for goodness. But I have to say that, through all of my experiences at PFoD and St. Philip, I, too, am starting to develop such a conviction.

Thursday, November 20, 2014

11/20/14

It's kind of hard to believe that so much time has already passed, but yesterday was the next to last inquiry class for the year. The topic was, "Jesus: Who is He for me?"

Unfortunately, I had to miss the B- group meeting because the inquiry class was moved to the same day due to Thanksgiving. I was sad that I had to miss it, but I told Barbara that I'd be there. I also told her about some of the misgivings I had, like my disagreement with some of the Church's positions and my heretical-leaning musings, and she said that it'd be good to get together and talk about it when it's convenient for both of us.

The topic in and of itself was a good one for me in that I've been struggling with that very question for a long time. Fr. Charlie started the night off with some of his ideas about Jesus and how his perception of, and relationship with, Jesus has changed over the years. He also explored the way each of the Gospel writers saw Jesus, and why they focused on certain aspects of his life and teachings, which I thought was interesting. (I wish I'd taken better notes, though.)

Afterwards, Fr. Charlie asked the other facilitators, Frank, Barbara, and Rose, to talk a little about which aspect of Jesus stood out most for them. Frank said that it was Jesus as a social revolutionary that really stood out to him. Barbara said she connected most with Jesus as a healer, of spirit as much as body. And Rose said she appreciated Jesus as a teacher. Then he asked the three of us in the class the same question, and I said that for me, it was definitely Jesus' role as social revolutionary that appealed to me.

Jesus the man challenged the religious and political authorities of his time for being both rigid and corrupt. He ate with tax-collectors and sinners (i.e, unsavoury people), and criticized the greed of the wealthy. He championed the poor and destitute, and he taught about love and forgiveness. He had no love for money, and he attacked the foundation of social classes, preaching that we're all made in God's image, and that what we do to the least among us, we do to God.

Thinking about it some more, I see Jesus as a bodhisattva of sorts, an enlightened being pointing the way towards spiritual awakening. He's divine and descended from royalty, yet he comes to serve rather than to be served. He teaches that, to enter the kingdom of heaven, one must help relieve the suffering of others (i.e., possess a mind suffused with bodhicitta. He lives a life of selflessness, healing the sick, comforting those in need, and preaching compassion, harmlessness, and forgiveness.

I still don't entirely know who Jesus is for me yet, but I think I'm starting to at least form an idea; and the image of Jesus that's forming is of someone worth following.

Sunday, November 16, 2014

11/16/14 (2)

Before the start of mass today, I was sitting quietly and trying to meditate on the peace of God, i.e., the peace of the unconditioned. As I was doing this, the question arose, If we're conditioned beings, how can we experience something unconditioned? If our experience is characterized by impermanence, how can we experience that which is timeless?

Then the thought occurred to me that, even though our minds and bodies evolved out of a continually evolving universe, maybe the unconditioned can be an object of cognition, radically transforming our conscious experience. Or that maybe there's an aspect of consciousness or divine nature within us (call it a soul, buddha-nature, or what have you) that's simply obscured. Or perhaps consciousness itself is a quality that's present in some form in nature all the way down to the subatomic level, even the fabric of reality itself.

The idea isn't necessarily that crazy. I tend to agree with Bertrand Russell, for example, that the more we understand about matter (i.e., energy), the more it seems the word itself becomes "no more than a conventional shorthand for stating causal laws concerning events" (An Outline of Philosophy). One possibility arising out of this is that what we call 'mind' and 'matter,' or nama-rupa in Buddhism, may ultimately be groups or structures of events arising from a substance that's neither wholly mental nor material, but in between the two a la neutral monism, i.e., the distinction between the two might not be as rigid as it appears.

From this perspective, I find myself increasingly comparing God to the pure Mind of Zen, the substance of all phenomena, out of which all experience unfolds. And when thinking about awakening or spiritual union with God, I see it as simply Mind recognizing itself, Mind seeing Mind, divine nature partaking of divine nature. It made sense at the time, at least.

11/16/14

I've found myself in a bit of a conundrum this week. On the one hand, if things continue in the direction they are, I'll find myself being initiated into the Catholic Church on Holy Saturday, April 4th. It's kind of strange to think about it considering my past issues with the Church, as well as my current disagreements with a number of Church positions; but I can't deny that this path feels like the right one for me at the moment. It's been an unexpected journey, but it's also been a rewarding one.

I really enjoyed my time at mass today, for example. Fr. Charlie gave a nice homily on success and using our talents in the right way based on the day's Scripture readings, i.e., to utilize the skills and talents we have by sharing them with others, to give them as gifts as Jesus commanded his apostles to do. He ended with a story that reinforced St. Paul's exhortation to "stay alert and sober," the lesson being, "Don't go through life so fast that someone has to throw a brick at you to get your attention!" And after mass, I stayed for the monthly french toast breakfast and got to talk with a lot of nice people, like Fr. Michael, Fr. Charlie, a lady named Connie, and some of the people from the inquiry class.

On the other, I'm wondering if it's something I should actually pursue, and a number of questions are starting to arise as I take the idea seriously. One is, Should I do it even though I don't entirely agree with all of the official positions of the Church? Is there room for dissent? Another issue is that some of the ideas I find myself entertaining border on heresies found in Pelagianism (e.g., the possibility that one is capable of choosing good or evil without Divine aid), Origenism (e.g., the possible pre-existence of beings prior to this life and the possibility of universal salvation), Americanism (e.g., the desirability of separation of church and state and the need for Church doctrine to evolve along with society), etc.

There's a lot about Catholicism that I find appealing, especially the contemplative aspects and the spiritual nourishment I've been receiving at St. Philip. However, I disagree with the Church's positions on things like women priests, married clergy, same-sex marriage, birth control, etc., which gives me pause. I feel strongly about equality, and in turn, my image of God is a God of love and equality, so it's hard to accept people in positions of authority saying women shouldn't be priests, gay relationships are sinful and same-sex marriage should be illegal, women shouldn’t have control over their bodies and reproductive choices, etc. And admitting all of that, I wonder if there's a place for me in the Church as an institution. I don't want to be excommunicated as soon as I'm confirmed.

I know I could simply keep these things to myself, but that feels dishonest and I wouldn't feel right keeping many of them to myself. Some, like the role of grace in choosing good, aren't really that important, and I could keep quiet about them since they're just speculations and not why I'm attracted to the Church. Who cares how or why I choose to do good as long as I'm doing good? But others, like my support of same-sex couples, are important to me, and I won't stop supporting equal rights for all just because the prevailing attitude of the Church is that discrimination is justified. Even though it may put me into difficult positions, I'm always going to stand up for what I feel in my heart to be right.

But that leads me back to my conundrum. I feel like I'm on this path for a reason. Despite my past aversion to Christianity in general, and Catholicism in particular, I feel at home at St. Philip. I look forward to each Wednesday and Sunday there. I'm full of new appreciation for the Church and what it has to offer spiritually. I want to fully participate in mass; and at some point in the future, I'd really like to attend the monastic life retreat at Our Lady. I just wonder if I'm truly on the right track.